Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Scott County’ Category

John Barclay really began to set down roots in Minnesota when he was awarded a patent for land in Eagle Creek, Scott Co., Minnesota.  Click on the link “patent” and it will take you to the BLM GLO search field for land patents.  When you locate John Barclay in Scott Co. click on that and you can obtain a copy of the patent.

Per Law of 1855 and Bounty Land given to men of service, Elizabeth Gilpatrick gives land as the widow of Thomas Gilpatrick Private in Captain Daggett’s Company., Massachusetts Militia, War of 1812 to John Barclay – NE qtr of Sec 23, Twp 115N, north of Range 22-West, No Fract. Section, 5th PM, 160 acres, Minnesota, Scott County. Signed by Abraham Lincoln, City of Washington Record Vol. 499, page 123.- #86 791 (291) Accession #MW-0499-123. March 3, 1855: Scrip Warrant Act of 1855 (10 Stat.701), dated 10 September 1861.  Land Office Henderson. Vol. W pg. 249-250, originally issued from Washington City, Family History Film #1043558 Scott Co., Minnesota Deeds/Indexes.

Here is a link to the Maine Genealogy website referencing a source on Massachusetts volunteer militia called out in the war of 1812-1814:  http://archives.mainegenealogy.net/2009/11/maine-militia-war-of-1812-lieut-col-j_14.html  Scroll down to Capt. Daggett’s Co. pg. 180 and you will find several Gilpatrick’s including a Thomas. 

Question:  What is the Gilpatrick’s relationship to John Barclay, if any?

This patent is also transcribed in the Deed books for Scott Co. Vol. W, pg. 249-250 FHL#1403558.

I also consulted the Tract Books when I visited the Family History Library in Salt Lake City.  The information I found on those films further verifies and gives additional information about John’s land.

Pg. 55 Part of Section NE 1/4, Section 23, Twp. 115, Range 22 for $160.00, Loc. by John Barclay 1 Dec. 1860 – John Barclay #5522, Mch 12 and June 11, 1856.

Also describes the other sections and who purchased them – James Hamilton NW1/4 and Michael A. Vierling SE1/4, SW1/4 not noted. Second pg. 86791 Oct. 1855 #5871.

Source: Tract Books, Minnesota – John Barclay, U.S. Government, Bureau of Land Management, Vol. 103, Twp. 112-115 N, Range 18 W Vol. 103-105 Twp. 111-115 N Range 19-29 W – Vault Film #1445667, pg. 55.

Approximate Location of Land

Microsofts Streets and Trips 2010 version. Click on the map for a bigger view.

“…Alexander moved to the area of Farmington, Minnesota, not far from Shakopee where George’s father chose to live “because it reminded him of his native Scotland.”  Logsleds to Snowmobiles pg. 105.

In 2007 I traveled to Shakopee, Minnesota and visited the area.  The downtown area of Shakopee has been revitalized and I could not help myself when I saw the sign. 

Eagle Creek Road SignShakopee Minnesota 2007

Shakopee Minnesota 2007

Read Full Post »

From the 1853 appearance of John Barclay in the Eagle Creek area, I am able to follow him to his death in Minnesota in 1897.  It is in Minnesota that he starts his second family. 

We first see this when we view the U.S. Federal Census for 1860 .  I found this entry under the name “Bartley.” 

John Barclay appears with his two sons Alexander and George and the beginning of his second family. 

1860 U.S. Federal Census, Minnesota

 

Minnesota, Eagle Creek, Scott Co., pg. 97, P.O. Shakopee, enumerated 15 July, 1860 by M. P. Clark – Dwelling 838, Family 838, John Bartley, age 48 (born about 1812), male, farmer, born in Scotland. Ellen Bartley 30 (born about 1833), female, born in Norway. Charles Bartley 7/12 mos old, born in Minnesota, Alexander Bartley 20 years old (born about 1840), farm labor, born in Connecticut. George Bartley age 17 (born about 1843), farm labour, born in Connecticut.   

One fact about my Barclay family is the ages will keep changing over the years.  According to other documentation Alexander was born in 1842 and George was born in 1844.  A two-year difference is not necessarily a big difference especially when you do not have an actual birth record.  What I do know is taken from military records.  To really know the true birthdate you need the parents acting as the informants.    

Their father John’s birth year as given here had him born about 1812.  I have an obituary and tombstone picture which puts his birth year at 1801 and that is an 11 year difference.  John’s age will change a lot over the years to come, so I really don’t know exactly how old he was. 

There is a bit of confusion about his 2nd wife’s name.  I have finally settled on the fact that it is Helen and not Ellen as this census has indicated.  Her surname maiden name is also a little confusing it could be Stevenson or Iverson.  It might imply she had been married before?  I will go over the documentation I have on Helen in future posts. 

As we see here Alexander and George are listed as being born in Connecticut.  Going back to the 1857 Minnesota State census (May 15, 2010 post) we see that they are also listed as being born in Connecticut.  So you can see why I have focused on Connecticut as their birthplaces. 

The other interesting point is the spelling of the name Barclay.  It has come down in my family as “Barclay.”  However, as you see here is it listed as “Bartley.”  I have seen other spellings.  Of course, this could be the enumerator’s take on the spelling of the name.  My great-grandfather and mother both spelled it “Barclay.”

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: